JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 29, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Juan Carlos Henao Pérez

✓Claimant Esperanza Chavez Fonseca Vs Telecom

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Cumplimiento De La Sentencia  T-729-04, En La Cual Se Ordenó Reintegrarla Como Beneficiaria Del Retén Social Hasta La Terminación Definitiva De La Existencia Jurídica De La De La Entidad Accionada, El 31 De Julio De 2006, Se Terminó Su Contrato De Trabajo Debido A La Liquidación De La Empresa, Pese A Esto La Accionante Considera Que Debe Seguir Protegida Ya Que La Empresa No Ha Sido Totalmente Liquidada, Interpuso Un Incidente De Desacato El Cual No Prospero E Interpuso Nuevamente Acción De Tutela En El Año 2009. La Sala Considera Que No Ha Existido Incumplimiento De La Sentencia Ya Que La Entidad Accionada, Tuvo A La Accionante En Nomina Hasta Su Liquidación, Se Decide Declarar La Solicitud, Improcedente.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Cumplimiento De Sentencia De Tutela
  • Improcedencia por cuanto no se presenta un incumplimiento de las órdenes proferidas por la Corte
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. R E S U E L V E:
  2. Primero. DECLARAR IMPROCEDENTE la solicitud de cumplimiento elevada por la señora Esperanza Chávez Fonseca.
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaría General, líbrense las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Juan Carlos Henao Pérez
Reporting justice
✓
Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva
Magistrado
✓
María Victoria Calle Correa
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 0cited by 2 →A. 313/09T-882/10 · cited 15 timesT-882/102010T-660/10 · cited 11 timesT-660/102010
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by2

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.